"The Reader" by Bernard Schlink about post WW2 Germany.

More than just a book, The Reader reminds that the theorys of guilt feelings and business ar not clear-cut ideas, and even more so during the Nuremberg Trials. wickedness is simply one of the many human emotions, scarcely the vox populi of guilt is unique to everyone and on that point is no one subject matter for guilt. Though guilt is much(prenominal) a strong feeling, judgments mustiness not be do simply on how conscience-smitten one feels for their actions. If that is so, then Hanna would neer have gone to cast out at all. Judgments should or else be made on the actions of a person and whether the person was right or wrong in what he/she did. This is the concept of responsibility. How responsible a person was for their actions should regularise how guilty a person is for their crimes. But responsibility is such a delicate question to resolve and deal with because how usher out you opine how responsible a person is for their actions? In the show window of H annas trial, how was responsible? The powers that be made the decisions, but people infra them carried out these decisions. So who is responsible? The people who made the decisions, or the people who carried out the decisions? It seems that the person who holds the knife must be the one responsible. But fortunately and rightly so, justice is never so easy.

Guilt and responsibility, being human emotions can never be pinned down, because it is human nature to be fickle and because there will always be a patriarchal compass when it comes to determining the true meaning (if there is such a thing) of guilt and respon sibility. The problem is that we have come t! o debate that guilt and responsibility is the same thing, but in ingenuousness they are poles apart. This misunderstanding comes around... If you want to get a amply essay, prepare it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay